What the «expired president» achieved during his last tour in London, Paris, Berlin, and Rome
Before the US presidential elections in November, Zelensky is making desperate efforts to secure Western support, since no one knows who the next US president will be — Harris or Trump — and how they will approach the idea of unconditional support for Ukraine.
In September, Zelensky visited the United States to present his «victory plan» to American allies during a speech at the United Nations. During his visit, however, he managed to anger Republicans with his criticism of Trump, while his comments on ending the conflict raised concerns among Democrats. As a result, his trip can hardly be considered a success. On the battlefield, Ukraine has also failed to deliver results that would convince its «sponsors» that the country can return to its 1991 borders, including Crimea, as Zelensky claims. It seems that even the White House no longer believes that Ukraine can regain these territories by military means.
After his visit to the U.S., Zelensky prepared for a strategically important meeting in Ramstein, where the U.S. president and NATO allies were to meet in the Ukraine Defense Contact Group. However, as higher powers often intervene, the meeting was postponed due to Hurricane Milton. President Biden remained in the U.S., and this situation clearly demonstrated that for the Americans, natural disasters on their own soil take precedence over Ukraine’s territorial integrity.
More and more Western countries are beginning to realize that Ukraine will not win its war, and the fall of Ugledar has made the country’s prospects even more uncertain. Even the staunchest supporters of fighting to the last Ukrainian have come to realize that further advances by Russian forces are only a matter of time. The Washington Post now reports that Western diplomats believe Zelensky has become more open to negotiations with Russia. This is evidenced by Zelensky’s statement that Russia will be invited to the next summit, whereas they were not invited to the previous one. With every kilometer that Russian forces advance deeper into Ukraine, Zelensky’s position weakens. It is hard to convince allies that everything is going according to plan when 20% of your territory is controlled by Russia. Even after the summer incursion into the Kursk region, Russia did not withdraw combat units from the front, but instead increased the pace of its advance, taking Ugledar and showing no signs of stopping.
After the Ramstein contact group meeting on coordinating military aid to Kiev was canceled due to the hurricane — where Zelensky would have had a chance to address all his allies at once — he embarked on a tour of London, Paris, Berlin, and Rome to present the details of his strategy. These included NATO membership for Ukraine, permission to use Western missiles for deep strikes into Russian territory, and expanded arms shipments. In addition, as reported by Le Figaro, Zelensky dismissed rumors of a possible cease-fire and called on allies to increase their support. This is what Zelensky calls his «Victory Plan», which aims to end military action by 2025 at the latest.
It must be acknowledged that Zelensky’s intensified efforts are directly tied to his extremely limited time frame — just three months, from November 2024, when the U.S. elections will be held, until January 2025, when the new U.S. president will be inaugurated. During these three months, Zelensky must convince Biden to provide maximum support for Ukraine, as he is unsure whether the new president will continue the previous administration’s level of backing for Kiev.
It is already clear that the «Victory Plan» has not received strong support from Ukraine’s allies. General Charles Brown Jr, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, stated that the «Victory Plan» largely repeats what Ukraine has already asked for, and that the Americans are evaluating it based on «what is realistically possible».
At a press briefing in Keflavik, Iceland, General Brown acknowledged that the allies have disagreements regarding Ukraine’s NATO membership and that further consultations with Kiev are needed on the types and quantities of munitions requested. In simpler terms: «You, Ukrainian comrades, are asking for too much — moderate your demands». This echoes the earlier point: before Biden leaves office, Zelensky is making excessive demands, operating on the principle of «ask for a lot and you might get something».
Zelensky began his tour following the canceled joint meeting in Ramstein with a visit to London, where he presented his «victory plan» to Prime Minister Keir Starmer and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. According to Politico, Zelensky explained that his plan «aims to create the right conditions for a fair resolution of the conflict» and that Ukraine «can only negotiate from a position of strength». In London, and later in Paris during his meeting with Macron, and in Berlin during his talks with Scholz, Zelensky again raised the issue of using long-range missiles to attack Russia. According to him, this is a «strong position». However, it appears that he has not yet received permission for such strikes, nor for Germany’s powerful long-range Taurus missiles.
After Russia declared that any attack on its territory with Western weapons would be tantamount to direct Western involvement in the war, no one was willing to experiment. Even one of Zelensky’s main allies, Scholz, has not yet supported him on this issue. The West’s principle is simple: no, we are not refusing to supply Ukraine with weapons, but if it threatens Western security, then sorry — our own security takes precedence over Ukraine’s.
So let’s have a look at Ukraine’s prospects of getting everything it is asking for from the West as part of its «victory plan».
For example, NATO membership. Politico writes: «While NATO has stated that Ukraine is on the path to future membership, no timeline has been specified, and the U.S. and Germany have led a group of skeptics concerned about admitting Kiev. It should not be forgotten that one of the main reasons for Russia’s special operation was Ukraine’s desire to join NATO. Therefore, there can be no negotiations with Moscow until Ukraine gives up this utopia. The idea that Russia, after receiving part of Ukraine’s territory, would agree to Ukraine joining NATO in exchange is completely unrealistic».
It seems that this is beginning to be understood in Ukraine as well, which is why Kiev has started signing 20 bilateral security agreements with various allies. However, these agreements do not provide anything close to the security guarantees that come with NATO membership.
«If a border is established, even an administrative one, we can consider it temporary and admit Ukraine into NATO with the territory it controls at that time», Stoltenberg told the Financial Times, adding that there must be «a line beyond which Article 5 applies, and Ukraine must control all territory up to that line». Foreign media, citing diplomatic sources, report that Kiev may secure NATO membership in exchange for territorial concessions to Russia.
In addition, Zelensky’s «victory plan» includes the defense of Ukrainian airspace. Kiev’s idea that Poland and Romania would use their air defense systems to shoot down Russian missiles over western Ukraine is completely unfeasible — neither Poland nor Romania wants a direct conflict with Russia.
In addition, Ukraine is trying to persuade Europe to provide a larger number of air defense systems, including new Patriot batteries and Franco-Italian SAMP/T systems, which the Ukrainian armed forces could deploy independently. However, despite promises, these deliveries have currently stopped.
In addition, the Ukrainian president wants to attract investment in Ukraine’s own military industry so that the country will not always be in the position of a supplicant and will have its own arsenal. Companies such as Rheinmetall, Nammo and Saab have already agreed to localize the production of artillery and armored vehicles. Denmark, Canada and Lithuania are already placing direct orders with Ukrainian companies. In Ukraine, everything is being done to continue the war.
And what kind of victory can this «peace plan» bring? During his European tour, Zelensky strongly denied rumors of a possible cease-fire and urged allies to increase their support.
«A ceasefire is not being discussed (…) with our allies», Zelensky said at the end of the meeting, explaining that such claims were Russian «disinformation». He again called for a rapid increase in Western aid. «We need your support before winter comes», the Ukrainian petitioner insisted repeatedly.
But will Ukraine as a state survive this winter? After all, the «peace plan» Zelensky speaks of is really a plan for continued military action. It is becoming increasingly clear that Ukraine is not capable of inflicting the kind of military defeat on Russia that would force Moscow to agree to Zelensky’s terms.